中国有色金属学报(英文版)
Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
| Vol. 26 No. 1 January 2016 |
（1. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Nonferrous Metal Materials, Ministry of Education,
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
3. FuDa Alloy Materials Co., Ltd., Wenzhou 325025, China）
Abstract:Arc erosion morphologies of Ag/MeO(10) electrical contact materials after 50000 operations under direct current of 19 V and 20 A and resistive load conditions were investigated using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a 3D optical profiler (3DOP). The results indicated that 3DOP could supply clearer and more detailed arc erosion morphology information. Arc erosion resistance of Ag/SnO2(10) electrical contact material was the best and that of Ag/CuO(10) was the worst. Arc erosion morphology of Ag/MeO(10) electrical contact materials mainly included three different types. Arc erosion morphologies of Ag/ZnO(10) and Ag/SnO2(10) electrical contact materials were mainly liquid splash and evaporation, and those of Ag/CuO(10) and Ag/CdO(10) were mainly material transfer from anode to cathode. Arc erosion morphology of Ag/SnO2(6)In2O3(4) electrical contact materials included both liquid splash, evaporation and material transfer. In addition, the formation process and mechanism on arc erosion morphology of Ag/MeO(10) electrical contact materials were discussed.
Key words: Ag/MeO electrical contact material; alloy component; arc erosion morphology; three-dimensional optical profiler
